Comparison Of Maslow and Rogers Theories

Answer: For those in the psychology field, understanding the differences between Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers and their humanistic theory could be of interest. Humanistic psychology was founded in part by Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers. Humanistic psychology is a branch of psychology that emphasizes inner strength and attributes, growth potential, and positive mental health. Humanistic techniques place more emphasis on positive thinking than most other approaches, which focus on an individual’s problems. However, there are variations within the methodology itself. The self-actualization theories of Maslow and Rogers provide insight into this.

Principles of Human Nature by Maslow

It is hard to think of someone who has never heard of Abraham Maslow or his theory of human needs. But when it comes to custom papers on behaviorism, client-centered therapy, and other psychological trajectories that have been evolving during the 20th century, the majority of them struggle. Let us now demonstrate some key aspects of Maslow’s humanism methodology.

• Rationality — Irrationality

Abraham Maslow believed that a person’s intelligence was their primary characteristic. He considered irrationality as well, but because he had a strong conviction in rational forces. It didn’t really affect him.

• Fundamentalism — Holism

Psychologists studying people’s states find that all facets of human personalities are interconnected. Psychological study should only focus on the individual as a whole.

• Liberty — Inflexibility

Maslow thought that an individual’s degree of freedom increased with age and ascent up the hierarchy of needs. It denotes the ability to forge one’s own identity via development and advancement.

• Environmentalism — Constitutionalism

It could appear from examining Maslow’s theory that the constitutionalism-environmentalism claim is less applicable because of his emphasis on freedom. The constitution and surroundings don’t matter if it comes to individuals who have the freedom to grow and create their own lives.

• Reactivity — Proactivity

According to Maslow, an individual’s conduct is the outcome of how their environment and needs interact with one another. This indicates that the scientist’s proactivity-reactivity balance is in the middle.

• Cognizability — Unknowability

We can determine Maslows’ choice for a psychology that would appeal to the idea of humanity by examining his opinions and his contribution to humanistic psychology. To him, a person is simply unknowable in the context of conventional psychotherapy.

• Mutability — Immutability

People have greater and more flexibility to select their paths and perspectives for personal development as they advance along Maslow’s hierarchy of requirements. It’s not possible to get stuck. Thus, people pick who they want to be, and even if they have a variety of alternatives, their personalities change according to the decisions they make.

• Subjectivity — Objectivity

Based on “here-and-now” principles, Maslow’s theory took an existential and phenomenological orientation, demonstrating his steadfast adherence to subjectivity. It is clear from contrasting Maslow’s and Rogers’ theories that Rogers valued subjectivity more than his colleague.

Rogers’ Essential Principles about Human Nature

Rogers had an extremely positive outlook on people. He thought that people were kind and creative by nature. This is the context in which his theories are developed. When discussing Carl Rogers, there are key concepts that must be grasped to comprehend the Rogerian viewpoint. Below we have examined Carl Rogers’ humanism approach:

• Liberty — Inflexibility

According to Rogers, freedom is essential to the actualization of humans. He is certain that a person’s decisions have the power to shape how their personality develops. Thus, Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers both believe that individuals can choose how they want to live.

• Fundamentalism — Holism

Rogers emphasizes a holistic approach in all of his arguments. He researched and comprehended people in general.

• Rationality — Irrationality

Rogers assumes that humans are rational in his hypothesis. However, the psychologist notes that some ridiculous behaviors also occur in daily life because of humankind’s “incongruence” with its fundamental nature.

• Mutability — Immutability

Rogers was dedicated to an adaptable stance. His theory, which is centered on personal development, enables this conclusion. According to the expert, humans are always evolving, changing as they go along and realizing their inherent potential as unique beings just like any other living thing.

• Constitutionalism — Environmentalism

We can determine from Rogers’ thesis that the scientist had a moderate level of commitment to constitutionalism in this wide sense. When reading his writings, terms like “human nature,” “true” “of man,” and “innate human potential” come up frequently. They underline that personality and human development have a biological basis.

• Subjectivity — Objectivity

As per Rogers, an individual’s self-concept serves as the foundation for their perception system. Humans are the main characters in a universe full of diverse experiences. Each of them has a subjective perception of the world around them, and they all respond accordingly.

• Cognizability — Unknowability

Regarding the conventional scientific understanding, Rogers thinks that an individual cannot be knowable according to his femenological perspective. Every individual inhabits their own subjective realm, and only a single person is able to fully comprehend every event.

• Proactivity — Reactivity

According to Rogers’ theory, human conduct is intentional, forward-thinking, and future-focused. Individuals are very proactive because they create their behavioral models. As we identify the tendency of self-esteem and actualization as the energetic source of human conduct, this trait becomes even more apparent.