Which best states how the structures of the excerpts are similar?

Which best states how the structures of the excerpts are similar?

A. Each relates an anecdote to appeal to the reader’s emotions.

B. Each presents factual evidence to appeal to the reader’s logic.

C. Each documents career credentials to appeal to the reader’s ethics.

D. Each discusses a political event to appeal to the reader’s logic.

Answer: B. Each presents factual evidence to appeal to the reader’s logic.

This option describes how the structures of the excerpts are most alike. It can be seen that in more formal, specific or argumentative texts, the writer will employ argumentation – facts and real-life experiences that prove a point. This approach satisfies the readers’ rationality and their ability to assess things.

For instance, an excerpt considering climate change may provide information about the tendencies in global temperature rise, melting of the ice caps, and the sea level rise. The above facts can be deemed as proof of the existence of climate change and its continued relevancy as the issue influencing the world. Likewise, an excerpt about the importance of exercising may comprise different facts that highlight the different health benefits associated with exercising including its role in improving heart health reducing the chances of getting chronic diseases, and its ability to increase the average life span of any exercising person.

Thus, authors enable the readers to independently assess the legitimacy of arguments based on factual evidence. This structure enables the readers to trace the author’s thought process and draw their conclusions from the materials provided. It is an appealing method that acknowledges the reader’s rationality and does not base its discussion on ethos appeal or anecdotal evidence.